âWe have more in common than that which divides us,â said Jo Cox MP, and on the sixth anniversary of her murder More in Common, the foundation set up in her name, published their report on trans rights to argue just that. After interviewing 10,300 people, they produced seven âsegmentsâ of British society based on their core beliefs on social issues, their values, identity and worldview. They then classified people by these segments to organise further focus groups and surveys on issues including trans rights.
The report explains the segments. Membership does not depend on voting patterns. They are:
Progressive Activists. They are politically engaged, and seek to correct historic marginalisation of groups. They have the lowest authoritarian tendencies of any group, but a significant minority believe the real injustice is the erosion of âsex-based rightsâ. Only Progressive Activists are embroiled in the social media wars on trans.
Civic Pragmatistsâ starting point is kindness and compassion. They are open to compromise and socially liberal. They are turned off by the divisiveness of the elite media debate on trans.
Disengaged Battlers who feel the system is broken and they are barely surviving. They see no point in engaging with the democratic system, but are tolerant and socially liberal.
Established Liberals. Prosperous, cosmopolitan, pro-market and status quo.
Loyal Nationals. Belonging to a group, and being British, is important to them. They care about fairness. They feel under threat from outsiders.
Disengaged traditionalists. They are self-reliant, patriotic, tough-minded. They emphasise personal responsibility and explain success in life by individual qualities rather than the System. They take social rules seriously and are judgmental about othersâ behaviour. They pay little attention to current debates.
Backbone Conservatives. They are optimistic about Brexit, proud of being British, and engaged with politics. They want clear rules and strong leaders. They are the most likely to think transition is unnatural.
More in Common did a survey and then focus groups. 74% of people said they knew someone who is LGB, and 24% knew someone who is trans. Thinking of social groups where I would say I know people, all of them include another trans person. In the past, in work, I met other trans people. Perhaps I have a lower threshold of what it means to âknowâ someone. 31% of Millennials (born 1981-96) and 48% of Gen Z (born 1997-2012) know a trans person.
2% of people included âthe debate about transgender peopleâ in the top three of sixteen issues facing the country. 64% named Cost of living, 32% the NHS, and 29% the war in Ukraine.
More in Common is keen to point out what people have in common. âThere is a strong sense of acceptance and compassion,â they say. Live and let live.
More people agree than disagree that a trans man is a man, and a trans woman is a woman. Only âDisengaged Traditionalistsâ felt otherwise. So the Times and the Tories have not yet managed to create some great divide over the issue. By contrast, there were sharp divisions between the segments on whether BLM is a good thing. The problem is they think a âtrans womanâ is someone who has lived in their true gender for a significant period or had genital surgery. But, the Equality Act protects us from the moment we decide to transition, and that is when we most need protecting: we are more nervous, and pass less well.
The report says people donât want to be condemned for an innocent mistake over pronouns, and some sound wounded. My impression from trans people is that in person we are keener to gently educate than to rebuke. We only object if it is intentional. But twitter is different.
It says people think unisex toilets are a good solution for trans women. That is silly. People are used to single sex toilets, buildings have them, law requires employers to provide them. Most women will rarely or never know that there is a trans woman in the room with them. Why have men in womenâs loos, because then the rule would be that trans women could use the same loos as everyone else? It makes no sense. Far better to just let trans women use womenâs loos. Thatâs the problem with asking people who have not really thought about the matter what should be done.
It says most people are not following the debate. They know JK Rowling said something, but are not sure what. But they are clear trans women in womenâs sports is unfair, especially elite sport. They say a male puberty gives lifelong advantages. That anti-trans argument has cut through.
It suggests that people are aware of the issues around gender identity, but they do not think of it as a political dispute. Instead, they consider how it affects their day to day lives and think about progress in practical not symbolic ways. They want common-sense, compassionate and fair solutions. They wanted to find some other way a trans athlete could compete.
There are four ways to approach culture war, MIC says:
1. Deciding to make things worse, for political gain.
2. Ignoring and avoiding the issue, leaving it to the polarisers.
3. Making passionate arguments which appeal to activists but turn off the general public.
4. Seeking to engage with the majority of Britons
They say most people want to be compassionate, and seek practical solutions. So, MIC recommends building upon areas of consensus, emphasise the shared starting points, and acknowledge the progress that has been made. They want spaces to have the discussion and provide answers to ordinary people.
They recommend, emphasise the shared starting points people have, and build on areas of consensus. Have a case by case approach, so exclusion in sport is OK, but emphasise the experience of people who have found solutions and acknowledge the progress that has been made. Create spaces for discussion, while stopping bad-faith actors setting the terms of discussion. But, âListen to those worried about the pace of changeâ.
Finally, âremember this is about peopleâ. I agree that having my life âbeing treated as ideological footballs is cruel and unnecessaryâ. There is a better way, but will The Times and the Tories follow More in Commonâs lead?