The feminist case for trans exclusion

Is there any merit in trans excluders’ arguments to exclude trans women from women’s spaces? Is there any harm to cis women from allowing trans women in?

If there were, we would have seen it by now. Trans women are in women’s spaces informally tolerated since the 1960s, officially under the Equality Act 2010, and even under Theresa May’s Tory government trans inclusion was seen as a good thing. Now, the English Nationalists in power seek to make trans people a vilified hate group, but they are not succeeding yet.

Any harm is not to all cis women. Many are trans allies, and say that they are perfectly willing to accept trans women in women’s spaces. However it is suggested that women traumatised by sexual assault may be retraumatised by seeing those they consider to be men in women’s spaces, that this is a harm to those women, so trans women should be excluded. For the purposes of this argument, I will assume such cis women exist.

We then have two groups of people whose interests conflict, trans women and these traumatised cis women. How could we resolve this conflict?

One way could be to argue that trans women are entitled to less consideration than cis women, or that our needs are not real, and trans excluders devote a great deal of energy to that, saying that our transition comes from false conservative understanding of gender, or from feelings which may dissipate. However trans women are real. Transition is in no sense a “lifestyle choice”, but something we do because we can’t bear not to. Without playing oppression Olympics, we can’t decide that one group’s interests should be sacrificed to the other’s.

Because trans women exist, cis women who merely feel angry that trans women are in women’s spaces are no more entitled to consideration than white women who feel angry at the presence of Black women. Trans excluders have sought to fan the flames of this anger, arguing that the presence of trans women is a danger or an insult. This is clear transphobia.

Trans excluders also collect all reports of trans women who are criminals, in order to stoke fear of trans women. There are criminals in every  social group (apart from the theoretical group of “non-criminals”). Sanctioning a group for the actions of individuals is wrong. Also, there are cis women who are criminals, and may pose a risk in toilets. The answer is to deal with wrongdoers, not collective punishment.

However there may be conflicting rights, between trans women, and some number of cis women, retraumatised when they see us, or placed in fear.

To resolve the dilemma, we could show that trans women in general are not a threat. Get to know some trans women. We don’t all look conventionally feminine, but the beauty myth is tyranny over all women. The Christian argument against the Shrek films was that children would see the trans character, see she was not evil, and come to accept trans people in real life rather than loathing and fearing us, as they thought people should.

In places where you do not talk to others, usually, the chance of a trans woman traumatising a cis woman is small. We use loos and changing rooms, then leave.

In rape crisis centres and women’s shelters, the two groups could be kept apart without reducing the service for either, and getting to know each other would reduce the hurt.

Then, what will reduce the suffering of female victims of male violence? Greater conviction rates might, societal disapproval, increasing women’s social status, dealing with the gender pay gap. A hate campaign against harmless trans women is the last thing to benefit cis women. All it will do is give them an out-group to despise, and direct their anger downwards rather than at the sources of their oppression. That is why the Tories support the hate campaign.

When you consider what might actually have value for some women, even at such a huge cost to so many others, in the trans-excluders’ arguments, you see how harmful their campaign is. It may arise from women’s pain and hurt, but it has no way of assuaging it.

6 thoughts on “The feminist case for trans exclusion

  1. You make a very good case here although you fall into the assumption that all trans women have a sign on their head saying’ I m a trans woman’ which clearly is not true but you allow others to assume that you can always tell ( or read ) a trans woman –
    Well even at my age I know this is false.I really don’t get misgendered and sone of the worst problems are caused by so called gender fluid types who don’t pass at all and create unnecessary fear amongst the group you mention here. The damage is even worse as they make the haters case so much easier to make against all trans women even those post op
    It is why all who use so called female spaces such as the loos and healthcare facilities really fir the sake of all need to look like a women rather than forcing an agenda which many think is counter productive
    Appropriate sensitivity is needed as well as behaviour

    Liked by 1 person

    • People don’t tend to read me on the street, but they do after a short conversation. So I don’t think I would be spotted in a loo. However, as more people transition- about 50,000 of us in Britain- people get better at spotting trans people. Most are polite- as with any other personal remark, few will say they see you are trans, just because they have read you.

      So I tend to feel fewer and fewer of us will pass, and I don’t want passing privilege to be the criterion for transition, because we would be in constant fear of being spotted or outed. Being trans is not linked to a particular skeletal structure, and I would not want to stop someone transitioning just because they will never pass, or force anyone to undergo FFS.

      The haters hate trans women who pass as much as those who don’t. They mock all trans women. They might mock those who don’t pass because of that. I feel we have to stick together. None of us gain if the haters divide and conquer.

      Liked by 3 people

    • Transmedicalisim only helps our enemies. Sad to see.
      True trans doesn’t exist you were non passing once. They and others even cis women who dont ‘pass’ deserve protection too.

      Liked by 1 person

All comments welcome.

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.