MP on self-ID

My MP is not interested in trans issues. I feel disrespected. He takes two weeks to even pass on my concerns. Then I asked to see him, he took eighteen days to respond, ignoring that request. He will pass on my concerns again.

On 5 March, I wrote,

The Scottish government has now completed its consultation, but the English consultation has not yet started. When will it start? Now, it is an issue, with the papers printing endless stories about trans people, many in a negative light. They bias the argument against us by picking inconsequential stories and giving them undue prominence. A small but vociferous group of feminists violently objects to trans women. When people say trans women like me as a threat, they may provoke violence against me: if they see me as a threat they feel justified in defending themselves against me.

There is a tiny number of GRCs issued, 4712 to September 2017. We are a tiny group of people, but we are a symbol in many people’s minds for many feminist or culture-war issues. I want not to be noticed, because I fear violence.

I feel that when the consultation is completed, the passions will subside slightly. People will go on to debate other things. Until it is completed, now self-ID has been proposed it is a live issue. The more people get radicalised around it, the more danger I am in.

Will you put my concerns to the relevant authorities?
Will you find out what is causing the delay, and when the consultation might commence?
Will you speak out for self-ID, and against the fear-mongering and rabble-rousing against trans people like me?

On 20 March Tom wrote to Baroness Williams of Trafford, who responded on 23 April. “I am sorry for the delay in my responses,” but not for the delay in the consultation. The Government remains committed to taking action to remove the barriers faced by transgender people. What action? Discussions are ongoing about the content and timing of the consultation… we are continuing to engage with a wide range of stakeholders… including transgender, LGBT and women’s groups, to understand better what they want from the consultation.

I quoted this to a civil servant who said it means “kick it into the long grass”. Tom himself ignored my questions, just sending the response to me on 25 April. So I wrote to him again:

That letter does not address my concerns. In particular, why is a consultation promised for Autumn 2017 in July 2017 still not launched? So, how long will this pre-consultation “engagement” last?

And you- have you familiarised yourself with what self-ID means? It is a minor administrative change which only affects trans people. Will you speak out against rabble-rousing against trans people?

Can I see you about this?

No. Well, he does not propose how I could see him. He is encouraged by the commitment to equality, and hard work is underway to build a society that celebrates and benefits from the talents of everyone. No, actually, hard work is underway to set us against each other by creating hostile environments for immigrants, benefit claimants, and now trans people. The consultation, to be published in due course Ha! will aim to relieve the bureaucratic and medical burdens for those who want to change their gender… and reduce the stigma faced by the trans community.

He has written to the Minister for Women and Equalities, not Justine Greening who announced the consultation in July last year, nor Amber Rudd her successor, but Penny Mordaunt.

The UK is a world leader for transgender rights, he says. No, actually, it is behind Malta and Colombia, which have self-ID.

The hostile environment is for immigrants and benefit claimants. Rather than paying fair benefits to people in need, the government spends more on sanctions, often unjust, arbitrary decisions taking benefits away and causing the rise in need for food banks. Sanctions cost more than they save. The government’s cruelty costs money. David Davies MP is a backbencher, a mediocre man who fails, usually, to stir up hatred, but this time is working hard with particular feminist groups. What are they doing for transgender equality? Nothing. Anyway, in March next year with Brexit our human rights will end.

4 thoughts on “MP on self-ID

  1. Thanks for another stimulating blog. I had a brierf exchange of emails with David Davies in August 2017 about his provocative comments in the South Wales Argus about same sex marriage and use of female toilets by transwomen. I wrote to him twice, he terminated our exchange as follows:
    “I am afraid I cannot get into detailed exchanges with everyone on this matter, especially as some of those who contact me with questions are clearly doing so in order to try and crate further rows.”
    As well as not proof reading his own emails he is clearly not as interested as I anticipated he might be in the views of trans people. Fine for him to write whatever he wants but heaven forbid if he is asked to account for how he comes by his views.
    It is of benefit to us all that you are prepared to engage with those who seek to marginalise us. Long may you continue to do so.


    • My own MP may be to the right of Davies, which is a scary thought. Davies does not care about the views of trans women: he wants to split the Left. Radical feminists against trans women is his first success. Radical feminists against Muslims or immigrants were fails, thank God, and rather stupid attempts- perhaps he just got lucky. Voting for a legal time limit for abortion of 12 weeks is a bit of a giveaway about his general feminism, but they know and are using him. Unfortunately, he’s using them, too.


  2. I’m sorry you’re having so much trouble with your constituency MP, Clare. You want to get rid of him at the next General Election, and I would like to see the back of him, too, just as I’d love to see the back of mine. ‘Kicking into the long grass’ is what the Civil Service has been adept at doing since the days of Cecil Northcote Parkinson, never mind Sir Humphrey Appleby! But, on this issue as on Brexit, it won’t do! One of the reasons for the latter is that we’ll no longer be protected by the European Union’s Charter of Fundamental Rights and Freedoms (CFR), or by the jurisdiction of the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU). If Theresa May gets her way, the UK will also be scrapping the 1998 Human Rights Act and withdrawing from the European Human Rights Convention and the European Court of Human Rights. Then there will be absolutely no protection whatsoever for anyone in the LGBTI community in this country, trans women included! Thankfully, not everyone in the Tory Party goes along with that agenda. Maria Miller doesn’t; Dominic Grieve doesn’t; I don’t think Ken Clarke does – and there are others. But Tom? Peter Bone? David Davies? Oh, they’ll go along with it, enthusiastically – which is why Labour and all the other Opposition Parties have got to stop them!


    • Even David Cameron was talking of “British human rights”, by which I think he meant rights he personally would support, in circumstances he would support them. Who needs Magna Carta, anyway? Habeas Corpus can be such a pain.


All comments welcome.

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.