Gender Diverse III

Arguably, trans is the most important issue in radical feminism.

If radical feminism is about recognising that the only meaningful differences between women and men are reproductive organs, and Patriarchy, which is the web of oppression in the culture around all women, then women need to unite to free themselves. The presence of men in women’s spaces makes that more difficult. Every aspect of reproductive physiology affects women, and not trans women, and women need the words to describe and celebrate themselves without those words being taken away or seen as oppressive by trans women. Women can recognise trans women’s difficulties, but are socialised to care for others, and that socialisation is part of their oppression. Their liberation means deliberately not looking after men, but considering women.

I am locked out completely by the principles, the underlying theory, the needs of women as a group and individually.

So what I propose is a temporary political alliance for political objectives. I observe that we transition, however unpropitious the circumstances. We get killed- this is not more important than women murdered by their partners, ex-partners or would-be partners, but the kind of fact that might put someone off transition, unless we were really committed. We go from the state of privilege, white educated male, to barely tolerated. You might debate what shards of privilege we retain, but it is less than before, and I hope we can agree little of it attaches to how we are perceived now. Many of us have an operation which is an extreme physical alteration.

We do all this because it is the best way we see of organising our lives, because we are unable to tolerate living as hard or soft males, we would rather be obvious weirdos in dresses. All this shows our desperation, however bad the circumstances. We will keep doing it as long as there are differences in gender roles; whether we would do it after that, I cannot know.

If you seek to exclude us from women’s loos and changing rooms, you seek the same as the extreme right-winger or evangelical Christian. Your reason is the same as theirs- that men and women are different. Your understanding of the differences, and your theoretical underpinning, is completely different from theirs, but people who are not studying the matter don’t dig that deeply. “Men and women are different” is as far as they go. “Trans women are men endangering women in bathrooms.” I have seen an Evangelical approvingly share a video made by a radical feminist, because she went no further than that.

Conservatives do not support us. Our rights come from liberal, soft-left or social democratic governments, and human rights treaties which the Right wish to restrict. We disgust the Right. If we supported traditional gender roles, we would please them, but we do not. We subvert gender roles. And despite a few outliers, most of us are on the Left. Human rights theorists support us though the scientific consensus has always been that a trans woman is a man: the researchers’ term for a trans woman attracted to men is “homosexual transsexual”.

So two oppressed groups fight each other, liberals sympathise with trans women, and only conservatives benefit. Liberal women will support trans women against the conservatives and radical feminists. Possibly they do this because they are socialised to be care givers, but the result is women are against women. You might see us as privileged, entitled and hostile, but we see ourselves as desperate.

Purely for political expediency, I suggest radical feminists temporarily call a cease-fire with trans women while we oppose our much stronger enemy together. We can reassess things later, after the conservatives are weakened. The end of patriarchy would benefit us as well as you.

And after all that, an image from Jupiter, taken by Juno when it was 12,400 km from the planet, of a swirling storm.

10 thoughts on “Gender Diverse III

  1. How can feminism successfully overcome patriarchy and negate gender identity as a meaningful source of disparity when the root cause for the disparity – gender identity – is exactly what the transgendered support?

    You see the problem for ‘radical’ feminism.

    This is not a trivial difference but the very essence of why there is a conflict. And I don’t think the transgendered will ever give up their need to use gender identity as the raison d’etre, which makes them part of the problem of maintaining patriarchy.

    Like

    • Why not? I have. I only need to call myself a “woman” if I need to justify myself. If it is just something people do, without the need to name, categorise or explain it, the problem disappears. People are getting angry about the description rather than the essence.

      And, with an almost overwhelming set of pressing problems, which is the most urgent? Can one find any way of making things easier?

      Liked by 1 person

  2. the root problem is fear of rejection and oppression. This is what drives humans and until that is addressed there will always be a scapegoat to blame. Hence for radical feminists the man who becomes a woman isn’t part of their lived experience and is seen as another potential oppressor.
    The good news is that at the level of the individual there are millions of people who treat individuals with dignity and respect even as their organizations harbor people at higher levels who espouse prejudice. Our best tactic is try to impact things one on one and the more people understand that all we want is to live in peace and harmony the more we will be seen as a friend and not a foe…..

    Liked by 1 person

    • How can it be explained to a radical feminist – or anyone who is not trans, for that matter – that a trans woman is not a “man who becomes a woman”? If anything, for me, it has been quite the opposite. I “became” a man to satisfy those who expected that of me; the woman that I am is but the relinquishing of my prior false behavior. This has been my experience – my reality, more accurately. We all have our own realities, and what’s right for one is not wrong for another. Failure to recognize that leads to futility, as attempting to live one’s life with the expectation that others must adhere to her/his own perspective, coming from her/his own reality, is impossible. To those who try, however, I’m both foe and faux, I suppose.

      Liked by 2 people

What do you think?

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s